Subscribe Log in

Log in

Remember me. [?]
Forgotten password
Not got an account?

Subscribe or register here

Toggle navigation
Student BMJ
Search
  • News & views
    • At a glance >>
    • Life
    • Briefings
    • Research explained
    • Views
    • People
  • Clinical
    • Practical skills
    • Clinical reviews
    • Ethics & law
    • Picture quizzes
    • Junior doctor survival kit
  • Specialties
    • Cardiology
    • Emergency medicine
    • Gastroenterology
    • General practice
    • General Surgery
    • Geriatric medicine
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics & Gynaecology
    • Paediatrics
    • Psychiatry
    • Radiology
    • Respiratory
  • Careers
    • Career planning
    • A career in...
    • Electives
    • Foundation programme
    • Careers advice
  • Applying to medical school
    • At a glance >>
    • Application timeline
    • Considering medicine
    • Medical School Selector
    • Work experience
    • Personal statement
    • Entrance exams
    • Interviews
    • Plan B
    • Graduate entry medicine
    • Mediprep course
  • Subscribe

Can complementary medicine be evidence based?

Yes-if it embraces standardisation and conventional research tools

By: Gavin Yamey

The editors of the New England Journal of Medicine recently declared: “It is time for the scientific community to stop giving alternative medicine a free ride.”1 Here were the voices of orthodoxy, loud and clear, sounding the death knell of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Echoing a long history of medical tribalism,2 CAM was once again under attack for being anti.scientific and grounded in unproven narrative.

Since that declaration, CAM practitioners and researchers have tried to defend their practices. They have begun to publish in peer reviewed biomedical journals, and they recently held an international congress addressing research methodology and quality management.3 A Cochrane collaboration will publish a series of papers, critically appraising systematic reviews of 30 CAM therapies.4 All this, despite minimal research funding or infrastructure.

So is the argument now over? Not quite, for there are still two fundamental conflicts between the “art” of CAM and the “science”

To read the rest of this article log in or subscribe to Student BMJ.

If you're not ready to subscribe yet you can access News & views for free or register with us to receive free updates on our latest content.

Log in Subscribe
  • Most viewed
  • What's new

Stay in touch

  • Register for email alerts

Contact us

  • Contact us
  • Advertisers and sponsors
  • Media

About Student BMJ

  • About us
  • Join the BMA
  • Subscribe
  • Write for Student BMJ
  • Review articles for Student BMJ
  • The BMJ
  • The Student BMJ scholarship
  • Request permissions
  • Sitemap

Terms and Conditions

  • Website T&Cs
  • Medical School Selector T&Cs
  • Privacy policy

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2018. All rights reserved.